National Sovereignty / Choosing Our Political Leaders-34-TruthSpeaker.net

Truth Speaker.net

Applying New-Consciousness Solutions

To Present-Day Problems

National Sovereignty

and

Choosing Our Political Leaders

Under our present election system, a moron and a genius are considered equally qualified to elect our politic leaders.

National Sovereignty should not include the right to commit mass murder.

In the United States, the electoral college is not only obsolete it's archaic.

Choosing Our Political Leaders

Who are the people most qualified to choose our elected officials? Obviously the more intelligent a person is and the more educated the person is, the more skillful he or she is likely to be at almost any task, including voting for a political candidate.

Under our present system, regardless of their knowledge, education, or mental capacity everybody gets one vote. A moron and a genius are considered equally qualified to elect our politic leaders. What does that say for the quality of our political leaders?

The naive, the uneducated, and the less intelligent are more easily fooled by the commonly used manipulative and deceptive political advertising. They minds are also more easily dominated by the peddlers of religious dogma. Thus, these people are more likely to cast their vote based upon what someone else tells them. The 2004 political election in the united states is a good example of massive voter mind manipulation.² Here's an alternative to our present election system.

One vote simply for being. Total votes = 1

One additional vote for having completed a high school education. Total votes = 2

One additional vote for having completed two years of college-level education. Total votes = 3

One additional vote for having completed a second two years of higher education and receiving a college degree. Total votes = 4

One additional vote for having completed studies that result in receiving a master's degree. Total votes = 5

One additional vote for having completed studies that result in receiving a doctor's degree. Total votes = 6

One additional vote for each additional doctor's degree. (honorary degrees excluded) Total votes = 6+

Never has the need for this type of change been more clearly demonstrated than in the June 2009 presidential election in Iran. The election was divided primarily between to different groups of people.

The uneducated, the poor and the mindless religious true believers supported the existing repressive government leaders who were (and still are) willing to kill as many of their own citizens and necessary to maintain their political power.

The opposition group consisted of the educated, the professionals, the intellectuals, those who wanted political freedom.

Here's another "far out' possibility that, at least, needs to be mentioned:

Regarding that June 2009, Iranian presidential election, there's a question that will probably never receive a clear answer. The existing repressive regime was caught in obvious voter fraud. In the midst of the resultant chaos, mass public demonstrations, and the violent government repression, the protesters were on the borderline between being violently repressed and toppling the existing government.

In spite of the Government's attempt to hide its actions from the world, the story was receiving wide television, media coverage all over the world. Through cell phone, Twitter, and other Internet technology, what was happening in Iran was being broadcast to the world almost as quickly as it occurred. The stories were being sent back to the Iranian protestors so they, too, know what was going on in other parts of the cities and in other parts of the nation. The wide, television, media coverage was a major problem to the existing government. Removing the media focus from Iran was critical to the establishment staying in power. They could not continue to commit the mass murder of non-violent citizens with the world watching.

Suddenly the entire story disappeared from the media. It went from the main story to almost nothing in less than one hour. Stories about the death of Michael Jackson took over the entire public media. Iran simply disappeared.

From the cosmic perspective, there are no accidents, but from the perspective of the con-artist, manipulative, behind the scenes leaders of the world, the Iranian situation had the potential to trigger a world-wide re-evaluation of justice and politics. It had the potential to be the beginning of a completely new Middle East.

So here's the question: Was the timing of Michael Jackson's death an accident? Or is it possible that his demise was intentionally hastened up by a few weeks?

National Sovereignty

National Sovereignty should not include the right to commit mass murder. Of course, national sovereignty is important, but that right should not include committing the act of mass murder, or engaging in excessive political repression.

The United States Electoral College

In the United States, the electoral college is not only obsolete it's archaic, dysfunctional, and it gave us George Bush Jr. instead of Al Gore. It gave us the financial and economic meltdown that is in the process of destroying our present economic structures. It gave us four additional years of ignoring the already in process Runaway Global Warming.²